ASIC continues to act against SMSF auditors

ASIC has acted against a further 11 self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) auditors for breaches of their obligations. This included breaches of auditing and assurance standards, independence requirements, registration conditions, or because ASIC was satisfied the individual was not a fit and proper person to remain registered.

Over the period 1 October 2022 to 31 March 2023, ASIC:

  • disqualified seven SMSF auditors;
  • imposed additional conditions on three SMSF auditors; and
  • cancelled one SMSF auditor.

Ten of these SMSF auditors were referred to ASIC by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). One SMSF auditor did not comply with conditions imposed by ASIC on their SMSF auditor registration.

This follows the cancellation of 374 SMSF auditors in January 2023 (23-012MR).

ASIC Commissioner Danielle Press said, ‘SMSF auditors play an essential role in supporting confidence in the SMSF sector. To protect the integrity of the SMSF sector, ASIC will continue to act against SMSF auditors whose conduct falls short or who do not meet their obligations.’

Donald Douglas, Clive Henley, Michael Macleod, Phillip Lloyd Scott, Leo Sheppet, Wayne Simpson and Graeme Whyte were disqualified from being SMSF auditors. Their names have been placed on ASIC’s public banned and disqualified register and are not eligible to reapply for registration. Mr Henley has applied to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for the disqualification decision to be reviewed. 

Biren Joshi, Narendra Kasandaria and Leslie McMillan had additional conditions imposed on their registration. Conditions are specific to the auditor (see the SMSF Auditor register), and can require undertaking additional professional development or the SMSF auditor competency exam, having independent reviews of three audit files and/or audit tools, templates and methodology, and notifying their professional accounting association of the additional conditions.

Mark Wright had his registration as an SMSF auditor cancelled.

Background

Approved SMSF auditors are registered with ASIC under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act).

ASIC and the ATO work closely together as co-regulators of SMSF auditors. The ATO monitors SMSF auditor conduct and can refer matters to ASIC. ASIC also monitors the SMSF auditor population for non-compliance and is empowered to disqualify, suspend, cancel or impose additional conditions on the registration of SMSF auditors.

ASIC may make an order disqualifying or suspending a person from being an approved SMSF auditor, under section 130F of the SIS Act, if the person has failed to carry out or perform adequately and properly the duties and functions of an auditor or is not a fit and proper person to be an approved SMSF auditor. A disqualified SMSF auditor is placed on ASIC’s public banned and disqualified register at connectonline.asic.gov.au and is not eligible to reapply for registration.

ASIC may impose conditions on an SMSF auditor’s registration under section 128D of the SIS Act, or may cancel the registration of an SMSF auditor under section 128E of the SIS Act for non-compliance with conditions or failing to lodge annual statements in the required timeframe.

SMSF auditors have the right to appeal decisions ASIC makes in relation to them under the SIS Act. They may request that ASIC reconsider a decision it has made against them. If the decision is confirmed or varied the SMSF auditor may apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for further review of the decision.

Further information can be found on ASIC’s website and in Regulatory Guide 243 Registration of self-managed superannuation fund auditors.

SMSF trustees and members can check whether their auditor is registered, suspended or has conditions imposed on their registration by searching ASIC’s SMSF Auditor register.

Source from ASIC Website

Please contact Wiselink Accountants for further information.

accountant melbourne

Related Posts

10

Dec
English Post, Finance Services

Withdrawal and contribution due to divorce not considered ‘special circumstances’ regarding excess super contributions

In a recent decision, the AAT rejected a taxpayer’s claim that there were ‘special circumstances’, that warranted an excess contributions determination to disregard or re-allocate an excess contribution. Facts In October 2018 the taxpayer separated from his wife. As at 30 June 2019, the taxpayer’s total superannuation balance was recorded at just over $1,820,000, held in separate […]

10

Dec
Chinese Post, Finance Services

离婚导致的提款和缴款不被视为超额超级缴款的“特殊情况”

在最近的一项裁决中,AAT 驳回了纳税人的主张,即存在“特殊情况”,需要作出超额缴款裁定,以忽略或重新分配超额缴款。 事实 2018 年 10 月,纳税人与妻子分居。截至 2019 年 6 月 30 日,纳税人的总养老金余额记录为略高于 1,820,000 澳元,存放在单独的基金中。 2020 年 4 月,作为纳税人离婚程序的一部分,从纳税人的一个养老金基金中提取了 1,575,000 澳元,并支付给他前妻。这导致纳税人截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日在该基金中的会员账户余额减少了 427,497 澳元。 2020 年 6 月 18 日,纳税人做出了 100,000 澳元的非优惠性供款,因为他的养老金总余额(支付给前妻后)为 1,389,272 澳元(即在 2020 收入年度结束时低于 1,400,000 澳元)。但是,根据 1997 年 ITAA 第 292-85(2) 条,纳税人在截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日的财政年度的非优惠性供款上限为零,因为在该财政年度开始之前,他的养老金总余额超过了该年度的一般转移余额 1,600,000 澳元。[…]