Insolvency advice and illegal phoenix activity from ATO

If your business is insolvent or struggling to pay its debts, it’s important to seek specialist advice from a qualified and registered insolvency practitioner as soon as you can. Be wary of inappropriate insolvency advice that could lead to illegal phoenix activity.

Insolvency advice to watch out for

Registered liquidators and trustees will provide you with sound insolvency advice that you can rely on. But some insolvency or pre-insolvency advisers suggest actions designed to help directors avoid paying their creditors and create new companies to continue on without debts.

This is illegal phoenix activity and can result in serious penalties. Following this advice could put you at risk of a fine, criminal conviction or even a jail term.

Be wary if an adviser:

  • contacts you with advice, especially after your creditor has taken court action
  • suggests you transfer your assets to a third party without payment
  • offers advice on restructuring your business to avoid paying debts or other obligations
  • offers you a fee based on a percentage of your debt or obligations
  • tells you they know a liquidator who will protect your personal interests or assets
  • tells you about a valuer who can under-value any assets
  • asks you to provide incorrect information to authorities
  • suggest you can withhold or destroy relevant records to prevent access by the liquidator or bankruptcy trustee
  • suggests they deal with the liquidator or trustee on your behalf.
  • encourages you to engage in any kind of illegal activity.

What to do

If your business is experiencing difficulties, it’s important to take action and get advice straight away. The ASIC website has information:

If you need to wind up your company or re-structure your business, a registered liquidator or registered trustee will be able to help you.

The Phoenix Taskforce is working to stop people promoting or engaging in illegal phoenix activity. If you’re offered advice that you think is illegal, report it to us.

Ref: ATO website

Related Posts

10

Dec
English Post, Finance Services

Withdrawal and contribution due to divorce not considered ‘special circumstances’ regarding excess super contributions

In a recent decision, the AAT rejected a taxpayer’s claim that there were ‘special circumstances’, that warranted an excess contributions determination to disregard or re-allocate an excess contribution. Facts In October 2018 the taxpayer separated from his wife. As at 30 June 2019, the taxpayer’s total superannuation balance was recorded at just over $1,820,000, held in separate […]

10

Dec
Chinese Post, Finance Services

离婚导致的提款和缴款不被视为超额超级缴款的“特殊情况”

在最近的一项裁决中,AAT 驳回了纳税人的主张,即存在“特殊情况”,需要作出超额缴款裁定,以忽略或重新分配超额缴款。 事实 2018 年 10 月,纳税人与妻子分居。截至 2019 年 6 月 30 日,纳税人的总养老金余额记录为略高于 1,820,000 澳元,存放在单独的基金中。 2020 年 4 月,作为纳税人离婚程序的一部分,从纳税人的一个养老金基金中提取了 1,575,000 澳元,并支付给他前妻。这导致纳税人截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日在该基金中的会员账户余额减少了 427,497 澳元。 2020 年 6 月 18 日,纳税人做出了 100,000 澳元的非优惠性供款,因为他的养老金总余额(支付给前妻后)为 1,389,272 澳元(即在 2020 收入年度结束时低于 1,400,000 澳元)。但是,根据 1997 年 ITAA 第 292-85(2) 条,纳税人在截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日的财政年度的非优惠性供款上限为零,因为在该财政年度开始之前,他的养老金总余额超过了该年度的一般转移余额 1,600,000 澳元。[…]