Risks of using unregistered preparers

You are taking big risks if you use an unregistered preparer to:

  • prepare and lodge your tax returns and statements
  • provide you with tax advice
  • represent you in your dealings with the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).  

Tax practitioners include tax agents and BAS agents. They must be registered with us to provide tax agent services, BAS services or in some cases, tax (financial) advice services for a fee or other reward.

What are the risks?

Listed below are some risks that you face if you use an unregistered preparer to provide you with a tax agent service (which includes a BAS or tax (financial) advice service):

Sharing your myGov account details puts your personal and financial affairs at risk!

The TPB is investigating several cases involving unregistered preparers posing as legitimate registered tax practitioners, who lodge tax returns on behalf of their clients. These unregistered preparers operate, often by accessing the myGov accounts of their clients and lodging their returns through myTax. 

Please note that myTax should only be used by a taxpayer to lodge their own tax return, and is not an approved lodgement channel for registered tax practitioners. A registered tax practitioner also does not require access to their client’s myGov account to act on their behalf.

As such you should take care not to share your myGov password with anyone. Sharing your information (such as your myGov password) with an unregistered preparer puts your personal and financial affairs at risk.

Be protected by using registered tax practitioners

We protect consumers of tax agent services by registering and regulating tax practitioners, so they meet the appropriate standards of professional and ethical conduct.

Check the TPB Register or look for the Registered tax practitioner symbol to ensure your tax practitioner is registered.

Using a registered tax practitioner means they:

Source from TPB

Related Posts

10

Dec
English Post, Finance Services

Withdrawal and contribution due to divorce not considered ‘special circumstances’ regarding excess super contributions

In a recent decision, the AAT rejected a taxpayer’s claim that there were ‘special circumstances’, that warranted an excess contributions determination to disregard or re-allocate an excess contribution. Facts In October 2018 the taxpayer separated from his wife. As at 30 June 2019, the taxpayer’s total superannuation balance was recorded at just over $1,820,000, held in separate […]

10

Dec
Chinese Post, Finance Services

离婚导致的提款和缴款不被视为超额超级缴款的“特殊情况”

在最近的一项裁决中,AAT 驳回了纳税人的主张,即存在“特殊情况”,需要作出超额缴款裁定,以忽略或重新分配超额缴款。 事实 2018 年 10 月,纳税人与妻子分居。截至 2019 年 6 月 30 日,纳税人的总养老金余额记录为略高于 1,820,000 澳元,存放在单独的基金中。 2020 年 4 月,作为纳税人离婚程序的一部分,从纳税人的一个养老金基金中提取了 1,575,000 澳元,并支付给他前妻。这导致纳税人截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日在该基金中的会员账户余额减少了 427,497 澳元。 2020 年 6 月 18 日,纳税人做出了 100,000 澳元的非优惠性供款,因为他的养老金总余额(支付给前妻后)为 1,389,272 澳元(即在 2020 收入年度结束时低于 1,400,000 澳元)。但是,根据 1997 年 ITAA 第 292-85(2) 条,纳税人在截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日的财政年度的非优惠性供款上限为零,因为在该财政年度开始之前,他的养老金总余额超过了该年度的一般转移余额 1,600,000 澳元。[…]