Taskforce Action on Electronic Sales Suppression Tools

How the Serious Financial Crime Taskforce is acting against electronic sales suppression tools.


On this page

  • Businesses illegally using ESSTs
  • Taskforce warning
  • What should you do?
  • Accessing the SFCT ESST Intelligence Bulletin
  • Case study

Businesses Illegally Using ESSTs

The Serious Financial Crime Taskforce (SFCT) is aware of businesses using electronic sales suppression tools (ESSTs) to underreport their taxable income. With the increased use of digital technologies and online interactions, we are seeing:

  • Businesses supplying and using ESSTs or software to avoid paying tax.
  • Businesses connecting ESSTs to point-of-sale systems to:
    • Permanently delete, re-sequence, or misrepresent transactions.
    • Reduce sales values.
    • Produce fake tax records.
  • ESSTs taking the form of cloud-based software and linking to domestic and offshore payment platforms.

It has been illegal to produce, supply, possess, use, or promote ESSTs in Australia since October 2018.


Taskforce Warning

The SFCT is providing a strong warning to businesses about ESSTs.

We understand there are sophisticated networks of operators actively developing and marketing these tools to small business owners. They often package them as an “all-in-one complete business solution” with low commissions, website presence, and an online ordering tool.

To identify these businesses, we use:

  • Intelligence and data on lifestyle indicators.
  • Bank information.
  • Small business benchmarks.
  • Tip-offs from the community.

These businesses will be dealt with the full force of the law.


What Should You Do?

If you are a business using ESSTs, you should come forward and make a voluntary disclosure rather than wait for us to contact you. We may be able to reduce your penalties.

Business owners should exercise reasonable care when choosing a point-of-sale and other business systems to ensure they:

  • Meet their business needs.
  • Comply with the law.

If you suspect a person or business is involved in producing, supplying, possessing, using, or promoting ESSTs or software:

If you prefer to speak with us in a language other than English, you can call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 13 14 50 for help with your call.


Accessing the SFCT ESST Intelligence Bulletin

The bulletin warns businesses about the illegal use of Electronic Sales Suppression Tools.

Download the SFCT ESST Intelligence Bulletin (PDF, 117KB).


Case Study: Choosing the Right Point-of-Sale System

When purchasing a point-of-sale system for your business, exercise due diligence and thoroughly research a product before purchasing.

Dodgy operators are manufacturing point-of-sale systems with electronic sales suppression tools (ESSTs). ESSTs can take many forms—devices, hardware, cloud-based software, or other means. This illegal software allows businesses to untraceably falsify, manipulate, hide, delete, or prevent the creation of selected transactions from their electronic records.

They are marketed to businesses as integrated business products and solutions with:

  • Online ordering
  • Interactions with web content
  • Registered and unregistered payment platforms
  • FinTech services (such as mobile payment apps and online banking)
  • Marketing solutions

Many of these are offered as subscription services with ongoing weekly or monthly fees, often with low upfront costs.

Through ESSTs, these operators can:

  • Steal money
  • Steal client data
  • Hold business owners to ransom
  • Assume web domain names
  • Alter public-facing business information, such as hours of operation

If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.


Example: Sabrina’s Fish and Chip Shop

Sabrina owns a fish and chip shop. Her business has always been cash-based, making it easy to pay her employees from the till and under-declare her takings. Although Sabrina knew this wasn’t right, she continued to find ways to avoid her tax obligations.

Tech-savvy Sabrina discovered a product that could help her reduce her taxable income—an electronic sale suppression tool (ESST). She purchased a new point-of-sale system from a dodgy operator who attached a cloud-based ESST to it.

For a while, Sabrina continued to run her business as usual. The illegal ESST manipulated the store’s transaction records, allowing her to delete and re-sequence transactions at the touch of a button. Sabrina used the extra money to quickly pay off a large mortgage on a seaside property, buy a boat, and transfer money to her family overseas.

What Sabrina didn’t know was that one of her employees, Paul, had noticed something strange. When closing up for the day, Paul observed that the point-of-sale transaction record was showing unusually low profits on one of their busiest days. He reviewed the previous week’s transaction records and found that this discrepancy kept occurring. Paul found this suspicious and contacted the ATO tip-off hotline to report it.

After receiving the tip-off, the ATO referred the matter to the SFCT, which began an investigation into Sabrina’s tax affairs. Upon closer inspection, the SFCT found:

  • Sabrina’s personal spending was up to 8 times the amount declared as income.
  • Over 5 years, Sabrina had underreported nearly $4 million in business income.

There was strong evidence showing that Sabrina, despite being well-educated and aware of correct business practices, had deliberately chosen to underreport her income in her tax returns.

The estimated penalties Sabrina is now liable for are around $1.4 million.

Please note: Many of the comments in this publication are general in nature, and anyone intending to apply the information to practical circumstances should seek professional advice to independently verify their interpretation and the information’s applicability to their particular circumstances.

Related Posts

03

Dec
English Post, Practice  Update

Practice Update (11/2024)

ATO’s notice of government payments data-matching program The ATO will acquire government payments data from government entities which administer government programs for the 2024 to 2026 income years, matching data on government payments made to service providers against ATO records, including service provider identification details and payment transaction details. The ATO estimates that records relating to approximately […]

03

Dec
Chinese Post, Practice  Update

实务更新(2024.11)

澳大利亚税务局(ATO)的政府支付数据匹配程序通知 澳大利亚税务局将从管理政府项目的政府机构获取2024至2026收入年度的政府支付数据,匹配向服务提供商支付的政府款项与税务局记录中的数据,包括服务提供商的识别信息和支付交易详情。 ATO 预计每个财政年度将获取约 60,000 个服务提供商的相关记录,其中包括大约9,000名个人,其余则为公司、合伙企业、信托和政府实体。 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 插电式混合动力电动车的附加福利税 自2025年4月1日起,插电式混合动力电动汽车(“PHEV”)将不再被视为附加福利税(“FBT”)法律规定的零排放或低排放车辆,因此也将不符合电动汽车 FBT 免税资格。然而,如果雇主满足以下条件,仍可继续适用电动汽车免税待遇: 在2025年4月1日之前,使用 PHEV可免于FBT的;并且雇主承诺在 2025 年 4 月 1 日及以后继续为雇员或其同事提供私人用车服务,且该承诺具有财务约束力(请注意,任何选择性延长协议均不被视为具有约束力)。 如果在2025年4月1日或之后对先前存在的承诺进行更改,则PHEV的FBT豁免将从新承诺之日起不再适用。 如果在2025年4月1日之前,雇主未就向特定员工提供汽车做出具有约束力的财务承诺,则在2025年4月1日之后,雇主无权享受FBT豁免。 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 养老金因同情理由提前释放的资格 自2018年7月1日起,澳大利亚税务局(ATO)负责管理因同情理由提前提取退休金的申请。 只有在申请人满足法规规定的所有条件,包括没有其他支付费用的途径时,ATO才会批准提取退休金。 符合条件的五个主要理由是: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________  行政上诉法庭(AAT)驳回纳税人工作相关费用的支出 在最近的一项裁决中,行政上诉法庭(AAT)驳回了一名纳税人对各种工作相关费用的申请。 该纳税人在2020财年受雇为交通控制员。在该年度的个人所得税申报中,他申报了$9,800与工作相关的抵扣,包括汽车费用(使用每公里的计算方法)、差旅费用、服装费用和自我教育费用,以及补充的抵扣项。 澳大利亚税务局 (ATO) 驳回了所有抵扣费用,纳税人随后向 AAT 提出上诉 AAT 认同驳回纳税人所有与工作有关的开支申请,主要原因是纳税人未能通过收据/银行对账单或任何其他形式的证据证实这些开支。  此外,关于汽车费用的报销,AAT 注意到纳税人至少在某些时间使用了公司车辆。 AAT还提到,纳税人通常“没有尝试将工作使用与私人使用进行分配……即使我能对某种分配感到满意,金额可能也会微不足道,无法导致应税收入的实质性扣除。”