Claiming deductions in relation to a holiday home and considerations of the valid claim

Taxpayers should remember that they can only claim deductions for holiday home expenses to the extent they are incurred for the purpose of gaining or producing rental income.


They need to consider the following in determining whether the deductions they wish to claim are valid rental deductions:


How many days during the income year did they use or block out the property for their own use? Taxpayers cannot claim deductions for the periods the property was used or blocked out by them.

How and where did they advertise the property for rent, and is the rent in line with market values? If they only used obscure means of advertising, or put unreasonable restrictions or conditions in the advertisement, they may not be entitled to claim deductions.
Will any restrictions, or the general condition of the property, reduce interest from potential holiday makers?

If their property is not in a tenantable condition, they may not be entitled to claim deductions.
Has the taxpayer or their family or friends used the property? Taxpayers cannot claim for periods of private use or when the property is kept vacant for personal reasons.
Is any part of the property off limits to tenants? When taxpayers claim deductions, they should ensure they calculate and apportion deductions in relation to the part of the property that is available for rent.

Related Posts

The Treasury Building in Canberra, where the exposure draft for the 30 per cent minimum tax on discretionary trusts was released on 3 September 2026

11

Sep
All Topics, Business Solutions, English Post, Finance Services

Trust Minimum Tax 2028: The Election Instead of Restructuring

Treasury released the draft legislation for the 30 per cent minimum tax on discretionary trusts on 3 September 2026, and submissions close on 18 September. The rate and the 1 July 2028 start date were already known. What is new is a third option: a trust in existence at 1 July 2028 can elect to make fixed distributions to pre-nominated beneficiaries and avoid the minimum tax, with no restructure and no stamp duty expected. One condition cancels it, and revocation costs a year at the top marginal rate plus Medicare levy.

澳大利亚高等法院 2026 年 6 月 10 日就信托未付分配权益与 Division 7A 作出判决 —— 墨尔本布里斯班华人会计

09

Sep
All Topics, Business Solutions, Chinese Post, English Post, Finance Services

信托分给公司的钱算不算借款:高等法院 6 月 10 日判了不算,但已经签成贷款协议的退不回去

每年 6 月 30 日把信托收入分一部分给自己的公司,钱没真付过去,会计说要么付掉要么签贷款协议。这句话在 2026 年 6 月 10 日之后不再成立:高等法院以 5 比 2 判税务局败诉,认定公司受益人的未付分配权益本身不是 Division 7A 的贷款,ATO 已定撤回 TD 2022/11。但已经按旧口径签成贷款协议的退不回去,本财年最低还款按 8.77% 的基准利率算;Subdivision EA 与第 100A 条也仍然适用。而财政部 9 月 3 日的信托最低税草案意见期 9 月 18 日截止,未付权益的立法将另行推进。